In regard to your show on "Norway Terrorism and the Debt Ceiling" Webster Tarpley analysis (enthusiasm) of the apparentcy "conspiracy" vis-a-vis SISMIS, CIA, US Government, the 3 shooters reported by "BG," the Norwegian press, psychotic patsies like Oswald or Attawa (an :espistemolgical drama,") keystone cops analogy of police and the small boat that had the leakage problems where they had to return to shore, and took nearly an hour to get to the Island, the police telling Brevirik to "drop his gun" and surrender rather than the police just killing him? despite the fact he killed 76 people, the "conspiracy" is so bad it's a badly "crafted drama." I think Brevirik not only being CIA, as "al Qaeda is 100% CIA," and the Architecture of Destruction" 9/11 Controlled Demolition", as well as the bombing of the building near the Opera House in Oslo, on "Crafted Dramas" James Bond films, you missed a beat on the 4 thousand pounds of fertilizer to apparently make a terrorist bomb, it was just the "cover for terrorism," in this unsophisticated "novella."

In addition, the shooting was of the Labor Party kids-- many teenagers, "revolution," is the "evolution of the mind" -- promo of Guns and Butter starting the show-- which "revolution and the evolution of the mind" is in the kids, what were the kids and their Dads and Moms, schools, for example, teaching them and what were they reading?? it begs the question on "The Two Souls of Socialism" (Hal Draper) were the 76 kids killed reading Marxism. This is the core issue of our time: on Debt, Deficits, unions, wages, jobs, unemployment, chattelment, etc.

On missing the beat, you (Webster Tarpley) would be a laughing stock if you took the "cue" f/ Warren Buffet on taxes, "high taxes (Eisenhower Adm. 91%, not Obama of course) as confiscation of assets," and "confiscation of assets outright," or Bill Clinton, (Goldman Sachs!!!), but you did just that (took the cue f/ Bill Clinton), and on your analysis. A fascist from the Tea Party, or a better example, Ron Paul (?) could have rescued your biases.

You discussion is not legitimate. (see: The Federal Reserve Cartel: part 5: The Solution," by Dean Henderson (repudiating/cancelling 10 trillion dollars of the debt) and "The Great Global Debt Depression: It's All Greek To Me" ). on the 14th Amendment, and section 4 and on the "Debt Ceiling" is a "drama of contrivances" to hi[d]e the fundamental issue: which is "can we (see: Ron Paul on 1.6 trillion dollars can be canceled) we cancel or repudiate any of the 14 trillion dollar debt???" 10 trillion dollars of the 14 trillion dollars, for example, is held by SS, Pensions, and the private banks, which of course own the FED!!! If we cancelled 10 trillion dollars of our National Debt, then create ("out of thin air" for interrelationship, production, etc. ) the 4.6 trillion for SS and Pensions, and re-infuse it into new interest bearing accounts-- new mutual funds for jobs creation, for example, (SS, Pensions) , not treasury bonds. Additionally, if we cancelled another 5 trillion dollar of Debt the FED[,] which the FED and private banks are holding, we only need to create 500 billion dollars--1/10-1/30 of the 5 trillion-- which the banks only "have in" (minus their 10-30 to 1 multiplier), we would be left with only 4 trillion dollars debt.

There is also another plan to "flip" the entire 14.3 trillion dollars to a 1.4 trillion dollar surplus, but it's too lengthy a discussion for this e-mail, included in this (my) analysis (see:"The Great Global Debt Depression: It's All Greek To Me" by Andrew Galvin Marshall ) would be to "flip" the total Global Debt of 40 trillion dollars to a surplus of 4 trillion dollar (includes the 14 trillion dollars US Debt ) and vis-a-vis PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece, Spain: ), and Great Britain, France, Germany.

Tarpley was right about Obama and warned us. Just another neoliberal flunky--its over for us.

Perfectly stated EVmarc. Now if we could just get the lawyers in Congress to read the Constitution!

great show more from tarpley
Oppose Obama’s Unconstitutional Supercongress of Austerity Ghouls, aka The Twelve Tyrants
http://tarpley.net/
Social Security Is Not Welfare. It Is a Debt Due and Owing.
is an “entitlement” in the true sense of the word: we’re entitled to it because we’ve already paid for it.
The President could have a clean resolution of the issue, but he is not jumping at the opportunity. Rather, he appears to be ready to throw Granny under the bus by slashing Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid, all in the name of “compromise.”
The Fourteenth Amendment says debts already incurred shall not be questioned, “including debts incurred for payment of pensions.” That includes Social Security, which is an “entitlement” in the true sense of the word: we’re entitled to it because we’ve already paid for it.
In fact, the Social Security Act was originally sold to Congress and the nation in 1935 not as a government benefit, but as a retirement savings program. Earlier this year, the Urban Institute published a study evaluating the program in this way, concluding that the average worker who retires today will withdraw from Social Security just about the same amount he put in over the years, with a modest 2% real interest rate (after inflation).
A deal is a deal. We paid for it, we are owed it, and the U.S. government is good for it. To change the terms of the deal ex post facto is both a breach of contract and a violation of the Constitution.
http://webofdebt.wordpress.com/forget-compromise-the-debt-ceiling-is-unc...