There three Socialist parties, the Green party and justice party and communist party, but you’ve put an “apologist-progressive” of Ohh-bom-bah-bin-dingy on, instead of having a discussions on “oil is a Resource, what then is ‘different’ transport-Fuel” or instead of having a DVD of Smiley Tavis and Prof West!

The whole northern-Cal of and inter-Nay (online) does not need an “apologist” kPFA-fm. Given time Van Jones may be rid of his dementia of not correlating MOVE and Davidians, and not-so-Depleted uranium nor the word “peace” discussed on Sunday’s. We are not-Apologist, altho the definition is positive concern when necessitating what not whatever.

Better choices makes for better understanding from good broadcasts... he represents a tact, is not leading in broader sense of logic toward non one-Party system, does not represent the long history of non-liberalist progressives.

The republic is gone; the new-Rome is here. If we need to discuss apologist-political resplendency, do we need to discuss
“the word: peace”! “R” Addison